Editorial responsibilities and policy

Editorial Independence

The editorial decision-making process is conducted independently of the publisher and external influences. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over all editorial decisions, based solely on scholarly merit.

Editorial Responsibility

The Editor-in-Chief ensures the scientific quality and integrity of the journal and makes final decisions. Associate Editors provide support and recommendations.

Decision Criteria

Decisions are based on originality, validity, rigor, significance, and clarity. Discrimination is strictly prohibited.

Peer Review Process

The journal follows a defined peer review model. Editors select qualified reviewers and ensure fair and unbiased evaluation.

Reviewer Selection

Reviewers are chosen based on expertise and absence of conflicts of interest. Review quality is monitored.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts are confidential. Editors and reviewers must not disclose or misuse information.

Conflict of Interest

Editors must declare conflicts and recuse themselves where necessary.

Research Integrity

Editors address ethical concerns including plagiarism, data manipulation, and authorship issues. Screening tools may be used.

Corrections and Retractions

The journal may issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions to maintain integrity.

Appeals and Complaints

Authors may appeal decisions through an independent review process.

Data Transparency

Authors are encouraged to provide data and ensure reproducibility.

Editorial Board Responsibilities

The Editorial Board advises on policy and supports peer review.

Post-Publication Responsibilities

Editors address concerns after publication and ensure the integrity of the record.

Policy Review

This policy will be reviewed periodically.