Peer Reveiw Policy

Initial Editorial Assessment (Desk Review)

All submissions undergo an initial editorial screening to assess alignment with scope, compliance with guidelines, and basic scientific quality. Manuscripts may be rejected without external review if criteria are not met.

Peer Review Model

The journal operates a single-blind peer review system. At least two independent expert reviewers evaluate each manuscript. Optional open peer review elements may be supported.

Editorial Assignment and Independence

Manuscripts are assigned to qualified Editors who act independently and avoid conflicts of interest. Conflicted editors must recuse themselves.

Reviewer Selection and Verification

Reviewers are selected based on expertise and verified identity. The journal implements safeguards against peer review manipulation.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers must provide objective, confidential, and constructive evaluations, declare conflicts, and report ethical concerns.

Ethical and Integrity Safeguards

The journal may use plagiarism detection, image analysis, and other screening tools. Ethical concerns are handled according to policy.

Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review

AI tools must not compromise confidentiality or generate full reviews without oversight. Use must be responsible and limited.

Review Process and Revision Rounds

Decisions include accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. Revised manuscripts may undergo further review.

Editorial Decision-Making

Decisions are based on scientific merit, rigor, originality, and reviewer input. Editors are not bound by reviewer recommendations.

Author Communication

Authors receive reviewer reports and decisions. Revisions must be addressed systematically.

Timeliness and Review Quality

Editors monitor review timelines and quality, replacing reviewers when needed.

Appeals and Complaints

Appeals are independently evaluated and may involve additional reviewers. Decisions are final.

Transparency and Accountability

The journal ensures clear procedures, documentation, and accountability.

Post-Publication Review

Post-publication concerns may lead to corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions.

Policy Review

This policy is periodically reviewed to align with best practices.